• About

    There will always be chaos until anarchy is restored
  • Categories

Britons take to their bikes to get home: or a lesson in insane bureaucracy

Though i’m not usually one to cover Daily Mail news stories, this one (http://tinyurl.com/y3s923h) amused me enough to do so.

A British man from London (Tom Noble, 52) was forced by ferry operator Norfolkline to buy a bike so he could board a ferry home, they had no foot passenger tickets left, and the ferry company would only allow him (and others) to use cyclist tickets if they could demonstrate that they were genuine cyclists.

Were it not bad enough that they had forced this guy to buy a woman’s bike just to get a ticket (another guy had to buy a child’s bike), Norfolkline obviously wanted to drive the embarrassment and exploitation home by forcing them to ride the bikes onto the ferry. So, one guy had to ride a rusty woman’s bike, another guy a child’s bike – don’t get me wrong, if Norfolkline staff have just done this to amuse themselves then fair enough, but if this is some kind of official policy then their HR department have far too much time on their hands.

Read the full Daily Mail article here

Leaders Debate (#leadersdebate) – Round 1

Well, like everyone except David Cameron and Gordon Brown, I think Nick Clegg walked away with that one. Both the Conservative and Labour leaders were acting like a pair of school boys arguing in the playground.

Brown, to his credit, had the sense not to talk too much, and even got some mildly humorous quips in against his blue rival, though for at least the first half of the debate his only point seemed to be that he ‘agrees with Nick’. Due to his seeming lack of commitment to the debate, and his constant agreement with Nick, I can only conclude that Brown will be voting Lib Dem come May 6th.

Cameron on the other hand couldn’t help jumping in with both feet, he seems to have spent so much time with minorities, the underprivileged and drug users that I am starting to change my entire view of Eton. Unfortunately for Cameron many of his anecdotes let him down, at one point he recalled how he had met a 40 year old black man, just the other day, he had come to the UK at age 6 and spent 30 years in the Navy, now, as much as I am sure the Conservatives would be in full support of sending immigrant 10 year olds to war, I honestly don’t believe this happened. At another point he was replacing Trident in preparation for our imminent invasion of China!

Clegg, he was the clear winner here, he gave the other two a shovel then allowed them to dig. He has clearly had great media training; though he looked a little nervous he presented himself in a steady, strong and consistent manner. His answers seemed well thought out and honest, which for a politician makes a change.

Well, looking at the polls (well, the YouGov poll is the only one out at this time) the day after, the debate seems to have equated to a 4% gain for the Lib Dem’s, a 1% drop for Labour and a 4% drop for Conservatives (the last 1% gain being soaked up by ‘other’). It truly does shock me that almost all the people last night thought Clegg was the best in the debate, the Lib Dem policies were the strongest, and that it was time for a change from the usual two horse race, but at the end of the day people seem too set in their ways as to who they vote for. Hopefully the next two debates will change this, it is about time people started to think for themselves rather than following their old habits.

Anarchy!

An excerpt from the illuminatus trilogy for you all today:

Somehow the conversation got around to a new book by somebody named Mortimer Adler who had already written a hundred or so great books if I understood the drift. One banker type at the table was terribly keen on this Adler and especially on his latest great book. “He says that we and the Communists share the same Great Tradition” (I could hear the caps by the way he pronounced the term) “and we must join together against the one force that really does threaten civilization—anarchism!”

There were several objections, in which Drake [Robert Putney Drake, a leading figure in the Illuminati] didn’t take part (he just sat back, puffing his cigar and looking agreeable to everyone, but I could see boredom under the surface) and the banker tried to explain the Great Tradition, which was a bit over my head, and, judging by the expressions around the table, a bit over everybody else’s head, too, when the hawk-faced dago [Hagbard Celine] spoke up suddenly.

“I can put the Great Tradition in one word,” he said calmly. “Privilege.”

Old Drake suddenly stopped looking agreeable-but-bored— he seemed both interested and amused. “One seldom encounters such a refreshing freedom from euphemism,” he said, leaning forward. “But perhaps I am reading too much into your remark, sir?”

Hawk-face sipped at his champagne and patted his mouth with a napkin before answering. “I think not,” he said at last. “Privilege is defined in most dictionaries as a right or immunity giving special favors or benefits to those who hold it. Another meaning in Webster is ‘not subject to the usual rules or penalties.’ The invaluable thesaurus gives such synonyms as power, authority, birthright, franchise, patent, grant, favor and, I’m sad to say, pretension. Surely, we all know what privilege is in this club, don’t we, gentlemen? Do I have to remind you of the Latin roots, privi, private, and lege, law, and point out in detail how we have created our Private Law over here, just as the Politburo have created their own private law in their own sphere of influence?”

“But that’s not the Great Tradition,” the banker type said (later, I learned that he was actually a college professor; Drake was the only banker at that table). “What Mr. Adler means by the Great Tradition—”

“What Mortimer means by the Great Tradition,” hawk-face interrupted rudely, “is a set of myths and fables invented to legitimize or sugar-coat the institution of privilege. Correct me if I’m wrong,” he added more politely but with a sardonic grin.

“He means,” the true believer said, “the undeniable axioms, the time-tested truths, the shared wisdom of the ages, the . . .”

“The myths and fables,” hawk-face contributed gently.

“The sacred, time-tested wisdom of the ages,” the other went on, becoming redundant. “The basic bedrock of civil society, of civilization. And we do share that with the Communists. And it is just that common humanistic tradition that the young anarchists, on both sides of the Iron Curtain, are blaspheming, denying and trying to destroy. It has nothing to do with privilege at all.”

“Pardon me,” the dark man said. “Are you a college professor?”

“Certainly. I’m head of the Political Science Department at Harvard!”

“Oh,” the dark man shrugged. “I’m sorry for talking so bluntly before you. I thought I was entirely surrounded by men of business and finance.”

The professor was just starting to look as if he spotted the implied insult in that formal apology when Drake interrupted.

“Quite so. No need to shock our paid idealists and turn them into vulgar realists overnight. At the same time, is it absolutely necessary to state what we all know in such a manner as to imply a rather hostile and outside viewpoint? Who are you and what is your trade, sir?”

“Hagbard Celine. Import-export. Gold and Appel Transfers here in New York. A few other small establishments in other ports.” As he spoke my image of piracy and Borgia stealth came back strongly. “And we’re not children here,” he added, “so why should we avoid frank language?”

The professor, taken aback a foot or so by this turn in the conversation, sat perplexed as Drake replied:

“So. Civilization is privilege— or Private Law, as you say so literally. And we all know where Private Law comes from, except the poor professor here— out of the barrel of a gun,’ in the words of a gentleman whose bluntness you would appreciate. Is it your conclusion, then, that Adler is, for all his naivete, correct, and we have more in common with the Communist rulers than we have setting us at odds?”

“Let me illuminate you further,” Celine said— and the way he pronounced the verb made me jump. Drake’s blue eyes flashed a bit, too, but that didn’t surprise me: anybody as rich as IRS thought he was, would have to be On the Inside.

“Privilege implies exclusion from privilege, just as advantage implies disadvantage,” Celine went on. “In the same mathematically reciprocal way, profit implies loss. If you and I exchange equal goods, that is trade: neither of us profits and neither of us loses. But if we exchange unequal goods, one of us profits and the other loses. Mathematically. Certainly. Now, such mathematically unequal exchanges will always occur because some traders will be shrewder than others. But in total freedom— in anarchy— such unequal exchanges will be sporadic and irregular. A phenomenon of unpredictable periodicity, mathematically speaking. Now look about you, professor— raise your nose from your great books and survey the actual world as it is— and you will not observe such unpredictable functions. You will observe, instead, a mathematically smooth function, a steady profit accruing to one group and an equally steady loss accumulating for all others. Why is this, professor? Because the system is not free or random, any mathematician would tell you a priori. Well, then, where is the determining function, the factor that controls the other variables? You have named it yourself, or Mr. Adler has: the Great Tradition. Privilege, I prefer to call it. When A meets B in the marketplace, they do not bargain as equals. A bargains from a position of privilege; hence, he always profits and B always loses. There is no more Free Market here than there is on the other side of the Iron Curtain. The privileges, or Private Laws— the rules of the game, as promulgated by the Politburo and the General Congress of the Communist Party on that side and by the U.S. government and the Federal Reserve Board on this side— are slightly different; that’s all. And it is this that is threatened by anarchists, and by the repressed anarchist in each of us,” he concluded, strongly emphasizing the last clause, staring at Drake, not at the professor.

Majority of the public want the UK railways renationalized

Just seen the politics home research available here. It now looks like the majority of people in the UK now want the railways to be renationalized. That in itself doesn’t supprise me much, but the fact that the majority of Conservative supporters also support renationalization of the railway does.

It is only a small sample for the poll (1219 people), but still – will be interesting to see if this becomes a ‘hot topic’ in the near future.

Quick update

Just a quick update as I seem to have neglected KiasWorld for a while. Hoping to move all the sites to a UK server soon, with a nice off-site back-up which should make things a little better.

Been working on a new website for my village lately -> KirkIreton.com – Check it out, it’s coming together nicely.

WSFF is a little slow atm – I assume everyone is out enjoying the summer.

Also, need to get to work on transitionMovement, and all the related sites; it’s a big job, and I ahve been putting it off hoping that some help would magically appear – no luck yet :-(

Anyway, that’s the quick update – will try to be more active.

Major Server Downtime

Sorry to all for the time we have been away – there was a major hacking incident on our webhost which has caused untold damage.

Thankfully, we are back up (mostly) wespeakforfreedom.com will not be back online until tonight as I do not have the passwords with me.

All in all it has been a bad couple of days – but others have had it much worse and this incident MAY have been responcible for one suicide – so I think we got off lightly with the server being down.

All my thanks go out to the guys & gals at vaserv.com – they have worked tirelessly for the last two days to try to bring us – and all the other servers back online.

It is possible we will go offline again – and there is talk in the air of vaserv being sold after this incident – I will keep you informed of what is happening with the sites as and when I know.

Kia

UK local elections 2009

WTF has happened? I can understand Labour collapsing – but Conservative taking everything? Again WTF – does nobody remember the expences for duck houses, moat cleaning etc.

Also – what happened to Lib Dems? – how did they end up dropping seats and councils?

I truely am at a loss – can anyone explain to me what happened?

Lets see what happens in the Euro’s on Sunday – hope its better (I admit that I am no longer sure what ‘better’ would be).

Welcome to the new KiasWorld

Okay – most of the old Kiasworld stuff has now been moved to either transitionMovement or WeSpeakForFreedom. The old Kiasworld blog is still at http://kiasworld.co.uk/blog – if anyone is looking for a specific article that used to be on the site – let me know in the comments and i’ll tell you where it is moved to.